What's on Practical Law?

What to expect in pensions law in 2012

Practical Law UK Legal Update 2-513-6498 (Approx. 17 pages)

What to expect in pensions law in 2012

by PLC Pensions
A look ahead at likely developments in pensions law in 2012. (Free access.)
This update highlights likely developments in the next 12 months that will be relevant for pensions practitioners. Links are provided to our legal updates and other materials for more detailed information about each subject.
For ongoing information charting the progress of particular cases, legislation and regulatory developments, see our Case tracker and Pensions legislative and regulatory developments tracker. For topical news and market practice information, see our Hot topics: news and analysis page.

Potential highlights

  • Auto-enrolment. For UK pension lawyers, 2012 has long been associated with the introduction of auto-enrolment duties on employers. Legislation will require employers to auto-enrol most of their workforce in a qualifying pension scheme and make minimum annual contributions. The full impact will not be clear for some time as introduction of the new duties is being staged month-by-month over several years.
    Following concerns about the impact of the new duties on small businesses, the DWP announced in November 2011 that implementation will be delayed for small employers. A revised staging timetable is due to be published early in 2012. See Auto-enrolment and NEST below.
    To listen to a recent discussion by commentators with tips on how to deal with many of the key issues arising, see CPD-accredited podcast: Getting ready for auto-enrolment: key pensions issues.
  • More flexible management of employer debts? In addition to existing mechanisms for dealing with employer debts on corporate reorganisations, a new flexible apportionment arrangement will be available from 27 January 2012. The new mechanism builds on attempts by the previous government to reduce hindrances on corporate activity arising from the employer debt rules while retaining safeguards for members. See Employer debt below.
  • Abolition of DC contracting-out. From 6 April 2012, pension schemes will no longer be able to contract out of the state second pension on a protected rights basis. Abolition of contracting-out for DB schemes may follow. See Abolition of protected rights below.
  • Public-sector pension reforms. A deal has been struck on implementing the Hutton reforms, but the detail now needs to be addressed. One point that seems settled is that Fair Deal will continue to play an important role. See Public-sector pensions below.
  • Pensions Act 2011. Several provisions in the Pensions Act 2011 have already come into force, including several that are consequential on the change to CPI-based minimum indexation and revaluation requirements. Further provisions are likely to take effect later in 2012. For a guide to when the Act's provisions come into force, see Practice note, Pensions Act 2011: overview: When do the changes come into force?
  • More restrictions in other areas? Draft legislation is likely to be published by the DWP in early 2012 requiring benefits deriving from guaranteed minimum pensions to be equalised between the sexes. In other developments, the DWP has warned that enhanced transfer values (ETVs) will become subject to a new code of conduct to allay concerns that members are making uninformed choices. New HMRC regulations will stem tax avoidance in relation to asset-backed contributions. The European Commission is reviewing the IORP directive and pensions regulation generally. See European Union, Finance Bill 2012, GMP equalisation and Transfer values below.
  • Supreme Court cases. If court time allows, three pensions-related cases may well go before the Supreme Court next year. The cases concern the ranking of liabilities under Pensions Regulator notices in company administrations, the scope of the rule in Hastings-Bass and the reasonableness of retirement ages (now the default age has been abolished). See Court cases below.

Court cases

  • Wheels/NAPF VAT case. This case seeks to determine whether defined benefit (DB) schemes should pay VAT on their investment management services. Following the publication in August 2011 of an order made by the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) specifying several questions that have been referred to the ECJ, it is anticipated that these questions will go before the ECJ in 2012 although no hearing date has yet been announced. (See Legal update, Wheels/NAPF VAT case: details about ECJ referral.)
  • Bloom v Pensions Regulator. In October 2011 the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal by the administrators of the Nortel and Lehman Brothers group companies against a High Court decision that contribution notices issued by the Pensions Regulator following non-compliance with financial support directions ranked as expenses in the two administrations. It is expected that the Court of Appeal's decision will go before the Supreme Court, although it may not be heard until Michaelmas 2012 at the earliest. We understand that any appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the FSD issued against the six Lehman Group and 25 Nortel Networks group companies is stayed pending the outcome of this case. (See Legal update, Ranking of liabilities under Financial Support Directions and Contribution Notices in Nortel and Lehman administrations (Court of Appeal).)
  • Pitt v Holt. No dates have been fixed but the Supreme Court is expected to hear an appeal against the Court of Appeal's March 2011 decision. The Court of Appeal allowed HMRC's appeals and held that the principle in Hastings-Bass had been incorrectly applied and that previous judicial decisions had misstated the rule. The Hastings-Bass principle had previously been considered as potentially providing a remedy for trustees to avoid the full consequences of their mistakes. (See Legal update, Hastings-Bass: HMRC succeeds in Pitt and Futter appeals (Court of Appeal) and Practice note, Hastings-Bass: RIP?.)
  • Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes. The Supreme Court is due to hear an appeal from the Court of Appeal's decision that a rule requiring partners in a firm of solicitors to retire at 65 was a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims of workforce planning and providing associates with promotion opportunities. The Court of Appeal did not subject the retirement age of 65 for partners to much scrutiny on the basis that the default retirement age (DRA) of 65 "supported the choice of 65 as a fair and proportionate cut-off point" for employees. However, the DRA has since been abolished by the Employment Equality (Repeal of Retirement Age Provisions) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/1069) and so the choice of cut-off point might be more closely examined by the Supreme Court. (See Legal update, Compulsory retirement at 65 can be proportionate means of achieving legitimate aim.)
  • BT Pension Scheme Trustees v British Telecommunications and another. In the ongoing litigation concerning the scope of the Crown guarantee of BT's pension liabilities, judgment handed down by the High Court in October 2010 led to further "stage two" first-instance issues, which were heard by the High Court in November 2011. This judgment was listed to be handed down on 16 December 2011 but a transcript has not yet been made available. Meanwhile, permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal on the "stage one" issues has been granted but is understood to be on hold pending the outcome of the latest High Court hearing. (See Legal update, High Court rules that BT Crown guarantee covers post-privatisation new joiners.)
  • Police Negotiating Board and others v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. In December 2011, the High Court held that the government's decision to adjust public service pensions in line with the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) rather than the Retail Prices Index (RPI) was lawful. However, the High Court granted permission for the public-sector claimants to appeal against its decision on one ground (whether the relevant statutory provisions permit the switch to CPI). The appeal is expected to be heard by the Court of Appeal in 2012. (See Legal update, Government's adjustment of public service pensions to take account of inflation using CPI declared lawful (High Court).)
  • Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust. In December 2011 the Court of Appeal heard the employee's appeal against the Employment Appeal Tribunal's (EAT) decision. The court's judgment is awaited. The EAT found that the fact that the employee's notice period expired before he qualified for enhanced pension payments did not constitute unlawful age discrimination, as the treatment could be legitimately justified. (See Legal update, Age discrimination: notice of dismissal before redundancy consultation was justified to prevent "windfall" pension (EAT).)

Abolition of protected rights

  • DC contracting-out. From 6 April 2012, pension schemes will no longer be able to contract out of the state second pension (S2P) on a protected rights basis. Broadly all DC contracting-out certificates will be cancelled and scheme members will be contracted back into the state additional pension to build up rights under S2P. There will be a three-year transitional period from 6 April 2012 until 5 April 2015, during which HMRC can continue to pay contracted-out rebates arising for the 2011/12 tax year and make adjustments to individuals' National Insurance contribution records if necessary.
  • Abolition of protected rights restrictions. From 6 April 2012, as a consequence of ending DC contracting-out, the statutory restrictions that apply to existing protected rights will be removed and schemes will no longer need to make special provision for protected rights in their rules. Protected rights will then be treated the same way as other rights under pensions legislation.
    In November 2011 consultation closed on the draft Occupational Pension Schemes (Contracting-out and Modification of Schemes) (Amendment) Regulations 2012. These regulations will introduce a statutory modification power allowing trustees to amend their rules by resolution to reflect the abolition of protected rights. For more information, see Legal update, DWP consults on easement for amending scheme rules on the abolition of protected rights.

Auto-enrolment

  • Implementation process. From 1 October 2012, new statutory duties will come into force requiring employers to auto-enrol workers in a pension scheme and make minimum contributions. Employers will not all become subject to the new duties on the same day, as the government is staging implementation over several years. Following an announcement in November 2011 that staging dates will be delayed for small employers, a new staging timetable is anticipated in early 2012 (see Legal update, auto-enrolment delay for small businesses).
  • Auto-enrolment thresholds. The DWP is currently consulting on proposals to fix the level of earnings which will trigger a requirement on an employer to auto-enrol an eligible jobholder in 2012/13, along with the band of qualifying earnings on which contributions must be calculated (see Legal update, Auto-enrolment: DWP consults on updating earnings trigger and qualifying earnings band). Under the DWP's plans, the earnings trigger would be set at £8,105 and the band of earnings on which contributions must be calculated would run from £5,564 to £39,853. Consultation on the proposals runs until 26 January 2012.
  • Pensions Regulator role. Among several pieces of secondary legislation coming into effect on 1 October 2012, the Employers’ Duties (Registration and Compliance) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/5) will enable the Pensions Regulator to monitor and enforce compliance with the employer duties and safeguards.
  • Stakeholder pension requirements removed. Given the new auto-enrolment requirements, from a date in 2012 to be confirmed the statutory duty on employers under the Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999 to designate a stakeholder pension scheme (and most of the related provisions) will be abolished. For further information, see Practice note, Pensions Act 2008: a guide: Removal of the stakeholder pension requirements.

Employer debt

The Occupational Pension Schemes (Employer Debt and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011/2973) will come into force on 27 January 2012. These regulations will implement changes to the existing employer debt regime to introduce a new "flexible apportionment arrangement" (FAA). An FAA is intended to allow an employer who withdraws from participation in an underfunded multi-employer DB scheme to apportion its liabilities to the remaining employers. It will stand alongside the existing options permitting apportionment of employer debts on withdrawal, but practitioners hope will offer a more straightforward and practical solution in comparison to the current arrangements.
In addition to the new FAA, the existing "period of grace" provisions will be amended. These allow a withdrawing employer to postpone triggering an employer debt if it intends to employ another active member within 12 months after an employment-cessation event. Trustees will in future be able to use their discretion to extend a period of grace to a period of up to 36 months after the employment-cessation event. The time within which an employer must give trustees a period of grace notice is rising from one month to two months after an employment-cessation event.

European Union

  • Review of the IORP directive. The European Commission requested a response from EIOPA by 2 January 2012 to its call for advice in connection with the planned review of the IORP directive. EIOPA published two draft responses during 2011. Chief among EIOPA's concerns are worries that the Commission is looking to introduce Solvency II-style capital adequacy requirements for pension schemes (see Legal update, EIOPA publishes draft response on IORP directive review).
  • White paper on adequate, sustainable and safe pensions. A white paper is anticipated in early 2012 to follow the European Commission's green paper Towards adequate sustainable and safe European pensions systems, which reviewed the current European framework for pensions and considered the possible areas for change (including the solvency regime, portability and disclosure requirements). (See Legal update, EU pensions green paper: responses reveal little appetite for further EU-wide regulation.)
  • Portability tracker. In November 2011 in the pre-final draft of its Work Programme 2012, the Commission confirmed that improving portability protection was one of its "legislative initiatives" for 2012, (see Legal update, European Commission and EIOPA to press on with pensions regulation reforms). Portability proposals are also expected to be addressed in the Commission's white paper due in early 2012.
  • Solvency II. Currently the Solvency II Directive must be implemented by member states by 31 October 2012, but this date is expected to be put back by the proposed Omnibus II Directive. Due to a delay to Omnibus II, and concerns over the preparation of some member states and the EU insurance industry, it is increasingly likely that implementation of Solvency II will be split, with member states' transposition in January 2013 and implementation for firms in January 2014. The Solvency II regime does not apply to pensions covered by the IORP directive. For more information, see Practice note, An introduction to Solvency II.
  • Disclosure: DC schemes. The Commission's Work Programme 2012 released in November 2011 referred to "legislative initiatives" to address disclosure requirements for complex investments, to achieve higher levels of investor protection. These are scheduled for the third quarter of 2012 (see Legal update, European Commission and EIOPA to press on with pensions regulation reforms).

Finance Bill 2012

GMP equalisation

The DWP had been expected to issue draft legislation and guidance during 2011 to reflect its view that occupational pension schemes must equalise benefits deriving from guaranteed minimum pensions (GMPs) between the sexes (see Legal update, GMP equalisation: progress at last?). In the event, no proposals appeared, but they seem likely to be published in 2012.
These developments follow many years of uncertainty on the question of whether GMPs need to be equalised at all. For a discussion of the issues, see Pensions in practice: Equalisation of guaranteed minimum pensions - a blessing or a curse?.
In the meantime, the PPF is proceeding with a pilot study to equalise GMPs in schemes that have entered assessment or whose members are already receiving compensation. According to the PPF, it discussed its plans with the DWP before launching the pilot study and is "confident that any amendments to legislation will not alter our approach" (paragraph 1.10, response) (see Pension Protection Fund below).

Indexation and revaluation

  • Pensions consultation requirements. Draft regulations published for consultation by the DWP in June 2011 will modify the requirements on employers to consult with affected members before making pension changes. The regulations will introduce an additional "listed change" that will require consultation where an employer plans to amend the basis of indexation or revaluation to a basis that "would be less generous" to members (typically, from RPI-based to CPI-based increases). The regulations are expected to be finalised and laid in 2012.
  • No CPI underpin. On 3 January 2012, section 19 of the Pensions Act 2011 (PA 2011) came into force. This provision ensures there will be no CPI underpin where scheme rules provide for indexation or revaluation by reference to RPI.
  • Cash balance schemes. Also on 3 January 2012, section 21 of the PA 2011 came into force. This provision exempts cash balance schemes from statutory indexation requirements altogether.

Money purchase benefits

The DWP is expected to publish draft regulations for consultation that will introduce consequential and transitional provisions arising from the new statutory definition of "money purchase benefits" to be introduced by section 29 of the PA 2011. This development follows the Supreme Court decision in Houldsworth and another v Bridge Trustees Ltd and another [2011] UKSC 42. Immediately after judgment was given, the DWP announced its intention to negate its impact by changing the statutory definition of "money purchase benefits" (see Legal update, Bridge Trustees: DWP to negate impact of Supreme Court ruling on meaning of "money purchase benefits").
Once in force, the new definition will have retrospective effect from 1 January 1997. The regulations are expected to address industry concerns about the potential impact of the new definition on past decisions made by trustees that cannot be revisited, for example because a scheme has wound up. The affirmative procedure will be followed, meaning the regulations will be debated in both houses before coming into force.

Pension Protection Fund

  • Deadlines for levy-reducing measures. The 2012/13 levy year starts on 1 April 2012. In December 2011 the PPF published its final levy determination for the year. The overall amount the PPF plans to raise in 2012/13 from the risk-based levy and the scheme-based levy will be £550 million. Some important changes will take effect to the current contingent asset procedure, bringing in more stringent requirements. The rules governing the levy framework are intended to apply for a three-year period to promote stability in the future rates of the levy (see Legal update, Final PPF levy determination for 2012/13). In April and March 2012 there are specific deadlines that schemes must meet for levy-reducing measures to be taken into account by the PPF in the levy calculation (see Practice note, How schemes can reduce their risk-based levy).
  • GMP equalisation. In November 2011 the PPF began a six-month pilot study that will use its proposed "underpin" method for equalising GMPs in schemes undergoing an assessment period, as well as for equalising the compensation payable by the PPF once schemes transfer. Schemes entering or currently in an assessment period will be asked to submit a GMP questionnaire, requiring collation of extensive historical benefits data. For further information see Legal update, PPF GMP equalisation plans: pilot study.
  • PA 2011 changes. Schedule 4 of the PA 2011 (which came into force on 3 January 2012) amends provisions in the Pensions Act 2004 (PA 2004) that govern how the PPF operates. These changes are intended to allow the PPF greater flexibility and autonomy in the way it performs its functions. Key changes include removal of the obligation that the PPF must obtain an actuarial valuation to determine whether a scheme is in deficit on a section 143 basis and removal of the requirement that an assessment period must last for at least 12 months. For further information, see Practice note, Pensions Act 2011: overview.

Pensions Regulator

  • Look-back period. Section 26 of the PA 2011, which came into force on 3 January 2012, has extended the "look-back" period that applies in relation to a financial support direction (FSD) so that it ends on the date the Regulator issues a warning notice. Section 26(7) of the PA 2011 contains a regulation-making power for a time limit (starting with the date the warning notice is issued) in which the Regulator must make its determination to issue an FSD or contribution notice. For further information see Practice note, Pensions Act 2011: overview: Pensions Regulator's powers.
  • Hybrid schemes. The Regulator is expected to develop its regulatory supervision of hybrid schemes as a result of research published in October 2011 that revealed widespread non-compliance with expected standards of administration and governance by hybrid schemes. From November 2011 additional questions have been included in scheme returns to enable the Regulator to collate further relevant information (see Legal update, Hybrid schemes: Pensions Regulator statement warns about risks).
  • Improving governance of DC schemes. The Regulator is expected to focus on the governance of DC schemes following its publication of Six principles for good workplace DC in December 2011. The principles focus on good administration and governance, adequate communication with members, accountability of those involved in running the schemes and prudent scheme design. For more information, see Legal update, Regulator publishes six principles for improving DC governance.

Public-sector pensions

Repayment of surplus

Section 25 of the PA 2011 came into force on 3 January 2012. This provision has extended the deadline for trustees to pass a resolution to allow future surplus payments to employers under section 251 of the PA 2004 until 6 April 2016. Also, it confirms that section 251 does not apply to a scheme in winding-up.
For more information, see Practice note, Pensions Act 2011: overview.

State pensions

The provisions of the PA 2011 which set out a revised timetable for increasing the state pension age came into force on 3 January 2012. These provisions mean that the state pension age for men and women will be 66 by October 2020 (rather than April 2020 as was previously to be the case, see Practice note, Pensions Act 2011: overview). In his 2011 Autumn Statement the Chancellor confirmed that the increase of the state pension age to 67 will be brought forward to between April 2026 and April 2028 (see Legal update, 2011 Autumn Statement: pensions implications). For further information, see Practice note, Pensions Act 2011: overview
In June 2011 the DWP issued a summary of responses to its green paper on state pension reform. The government emphasised that it needed time to consider the issues raised before reaching a decision and gave no clear indication as to when further announcements will be made, but potentially this will be in 2012. If the DWP does decide to proceed with state pension changes it has confirmed that a white paper and full impact assessment would follow (see Legal update, State pension reform: changes to DB schemes likely if contracting-out abolished).

Tax

Transfer values

  • ETVs. A new code of conduct on enhanced transfer value (ETV) exercises is due to be published in summer 2012, requiring employers to offer to pay for independent financial advice for staff. The Pensions Minister, Steve Webb, has said that the new code would be policed jointly by the Financial Services Authority and the Pensions Regulator. But legislation might follow if the code is not seen to provide enough protection to members. The new code is reportedly being drafted by the ABI, the Association of Independent Financial Advisers and the NAPF. See News round-up for the week to 27 October 2011: Minister announces ETV code of conduct. For more information about ETV exercises, see Practice note, Liability management exercises and inducements.
  • Small pots. In December 2011, the DWP launched a consultation exercise aimed at finding ways to reduce barriers to transferring small pension pots. Consultation runs until 23 March 2012. Given the expected increase in pension savers with small pots following the introduction of auto-enrolment, the DWP hopes to implement a long-term solution by 2014. This will include abolition of the existing right for an early leaver from an occupational DC scheme to take a cash refund or transfer sum if he leaves service with between three months and two years' service (see Legal update, DWP confirms end of short-service refunds and new small pension pots consultation).
End of Document
Resource ID 2-513-6498
© 2024 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
Published on 04-Jan-2012
Resource Type Legal update: archive
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Scotland
  • Wales
Related Content