What's on Practical Law?

Practical Law Family: what to expect in 2014

Practical Law UK Articles 3-550-6125 (Approx. 7 pages)

Practical Law Family: what to expect in 2014

A number of family-related developments are expected in 2014 and beyond. This article highlights the key areas to watch. (Free access).
This article summarises the main developments expected in 2014 that will affect private family law practitioners in England and Wales.
We will be updating our resources to reflect the changes when these are made.
Key challenges for practitioners include the implementation of the single family court due in April 2014 and the introduction of mandatory standard form orders with their associated house rules.

Single family court

The new single family court will be introduced in April 2014. It will be a national court for all family proceedings in England and Wales. Family cases will no longer be heard by the county court or the family proceedings court but will instead be heard by the family court.
The introduction of the family court will remove confusion about where family cases should be issued and heard. From April 2014, applicants will send their applications to the family court, which will allocate the case. All cases will be started in the family court. All levels of judges and magistrates will work alongside each other, hearing cases of an appropriate level of complexity. The family court will be able to sit anywhere, though it will usually sit in the county courts and magistrates' courts where family cases are currently heard.
The High Court will continue to operate in addition to the family court. This will preserve the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court and enable the family court to transfer cases to the High Court where recourse to its exclusive jurisdiction is needed. This will include wardship proceedings and certain international children cases.
The Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court are unaffected by the proposed changes.

Key points

England and Wales will continue to be divided into geographical areas judicially led and managed by the Designated Family Judge (DFJ) (subject as at present to the Family Division Liaison Judge and the President of the Family Division).
From April 2014:
  • In each geographical area, the DFJ will be based at a Designated Family Centre (DFC). This will be the administrative hub for the issue of all family proceedings for the entire local single family court. The DFC will also be the principal location at which hearings will take place. There are then likely to be one or more Hearing Centres attached to the DFC at which hearings can also take place.
  • In London, there will be three single family courts, each with a DFJ and DFC. The existing DFJ for London, His Honour Judge Altman, will continue to be responsible for issues affecting London for the time being, and will act as Senior DFJ across London, as the point of contact for all agencies and individuals who have London-wide responsibilities. London is the only place where a single local government area will have more than one DFJ. The family courts will be as follows:
    • One court in Central London at First Avenue House.
    • One court in East London, in Docklands.
    • One court in West London, probably in Westminster.
  • Each DFC administrative team across the country will:
    • issue proceedings for the entire local single family court;
    • allocate proceedings according to their type and complexity for the entire local single family court; firstly, to the appropriate level of judge (including magistrates); and secondly to the appropriate Hearing Centre if the case is not to be heard at the DFC; and
    • manage a centralised listing system covering all judges and all cases, whether listed at the DFC or at a Hearing Centre.
Practical Law Family will be updating its resources to reflect the introduction of the single family court and will provide guidance about what practitioners need to know. We will also keep practitioners updated through our weekly and monthly legal updates about the transitional arrangements and any other related news of interest.

Standard form orders

In November 2013, the President of the Family Division, Sir James Munby, released for consultation the first batch of 30 proposed standard form orders, which are due to become mandatory from April 2014.
The project was announced in July 2013 in the Fourth View from the President's Chambers. Sir James Munby P explained its rationale, saying, ''inordinate amounts of time and money are spent – wasted – in the process of drafting orders that could, and therefore should, be standardised".
The orders have been prepared by a team led by Mostyn J and cover many aspects of family procedure. They include the following financial orders:
  • An omnibus financial remedy order containing 87 standard form clauses.
  • A financial proceedings directions order containing 64 standard form directions.
  • An omnibus Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 order containing 80 standard form clauses.
The proposed standard form orders also include the following:
  • Non-molestation and occupation orders.
  • Arbitration orders.
  • Orders for use in committal proceedings.
  • Orders for use in forced marriage cases.
  • Orders dealing with reporting restrictions.
Further batches of proposed standard form orders will follow in due course.
Mostyn J's team has also produced ''House Rules'' which will govern the format of all standard form orders, including for example, prescribing that orders should be in 12 point Times New Roman font.
To view the proposed standard form orders, see Standard document, Proposed family standard form orders.
Practical Law Family will be publishing the new standard form orders as soon as these become mandatory, together with integrated drafting notes explaining when the various orders should be used. We will also keep practitioners updated through our weekly and monthly legal updates about the further batches of orders as they are released for consultation and dates for implementation are confirmed.

Nuptial agreements

The Law Commission began a project in October 2009 examining the status and enforceability of "marital property agreements". The term as used by the Law Commission includes pre-nuptial agreements, pre-civil partnership agreements, post-nuptial agreements, post-civil partnership agreements and separation agreements.
In January 2011, the Law Commission published Consultation Paper Marital Property Agreements (Law Com No 198). The paper reviewed the current law relating to marital property agreements, discussed options for reform and posed questions to consultees.
In February 2012, having considered the responses to its earlier consultation, the commission extended its project to consider the law relating to needs and the legal status of non-matrimonial property. Reform of these core areas of matrimonial finance will assist practitioners when drafting nuptial agreements and, in the wider sense, when advising clients of the possible outcomes in financial remedy proceedings. A supplementary consultation paper, Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements (Law Com No 208) was published in September 2012. Various discussions took place around the country including a symposium at Inner Temple Hall in December 2012. The consultation closed in December 2012.
The responses to the consultation papers show support for the introduction of qualifying nuptial agreements that will oust the jurisdiction of the court to make financial remedy orders, provided that appropriate safeguards are put in place. It appears from Law Com No 208 that the Law Commission is advising the government that:
  • Qualifying nuptial agreements should be capable of dealing with all property and should not be restricted to non-matrimonial property.
  • Qualifying nuptial agreements should not allow individuals to contract out of their obligation to provide for each other's needs on divorce.
The Law Commission expects to publish its final report on the Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements project in early 2014, together with a draft bill for Parliament.
For a summary of the practical implications for practitioners of the proposals contained in the consultation papers, see Checklist, Nuptial agreements: safeguards: Law Commission proposals and for a more detailed consideration of the proposals, see Practice note, The future of nuptial agreements: qualifying nuptial agreements.

Same sex marriage

The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 (MA 2013) received royal assent on 17 July 2013 and the government announced on 10 December 2013 that same sex marriages will take place from 29 March 2014.
The MA 2013 also provides for same sex couples who married abroad under foreign law and are currently treated as civil partners to be recognised as married in England and Wales and allows civil partnerships registered in England and Wales to be converted into marriages.
The government intends to implement the MA 2013 by laying statutory instruments before Parliament in early 2014. These will amend primary and secondary legislation and the Family Procedure Rules 2010. Implementation of the MA 2013 will lead to statutory reviews of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and differences in survivor benefits offered by occupational pension schemes.

Statutory child maintenance: charging fees

The government has published Child Support Fees Regulations 2014, which are expected to come into force in 2014. These regulations provide that the Secretary of State (SS) acting through the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) can charge fees for the administration of the statutory child maintenance scheme.

Application fee

The draft SI provides for the SS to charge a £20 fee, payable by the applicant, when making an application for statutory child maintenance. The SS will not be obliged to determine the application until the fee is paid (regulation 3). The application fee can be waived where the applicant is:
(Regulation 4).
The application fee is repayable by the SS if the child dies before a maintenance calculation is made (regulation 5).

Collection fees

Following the application, all non-resident parents (NRPs) will be given the option of paying child maintenance direct to the person with care (PWC). If the CMS is involved in arrangements for collection under the gross income scheme, a fee is payable by both the PWC and the NRP.
The NRP is liable to pay 20% of the daily amount of child maintenance he is liable to pay, which can be deducted from any payment of child maintenance made by the NRP to the CMS. The PWC is liable to pay 4% of the child maintenance which is collected by the CMS, which can be recovered from any payment of child maintenance which would otherwise be paid to the PWC (regulations 7 and 8).

Enforcement fees

Fixed enforcement fees are payable by the NRP if the CMS takes any of the following enforcement actions under the gross income scheme to secure payment of child maintenance:
  • A deduction from earnings order (£50).
  • A regular deduction order (£50).
  • A lump sum deduction order (£200).
  • An application for a liability order (£300).
(Regulation 10).
The enforcement fee is recoverable from any payment made by the NRP to the CMS (regulation 11). An enforcement fee can be waived in certain circumstances (see regulation 12).

Statutory child maintenance: transition of existing cases to gross income scheme

The government has published Child Support (Ending Liability in Existing Cases and Transition to New Calculation Rules) Regulations 2014. These draft regulations make provision for:
  • Ending liability in existing cases under the statutory child maintenance scheme, that are not subject to the gross income scheme.
  • The transition of existing cases (determined under the original or net income schemes) to the gross income scheme.
The transition period will begin on the date that the draft regulation comes into force in 2014 and will end on 31 December 2017. The Secretary of State (SS) will issue notices to the NRP and PWC providing a liability end date for the existing case (regulation 6). The notice will invite the parties to enter into a family based arrangement or to remain in the statutory child maintenance scheme.
If the parties choose the latter, they must apply for a statutory child maintenance calculation under the gross income scheme before the liability end date (regulation 5). The calculation will be made on the information available on the date that the NRP is notified of the application but will be backdated to the day after the liability end date (regulation 7).
The following cases will not be subject to transition to the gross income scheme:
  • A new application made for a maintenance calculation that is related to an existing case. The new application will automatically trigger a process for bringing liability to an end in the existing case, so that all calculations are made under the gross income scheme.
  • The youngest or only qualifying child reaching the age of 20 before the end of the transition period on 31 December 2017.
(Regulations 4(2) and (3)).

Child arrangement orders

The Children and Families Bill 2013 (CFB 2013) was laid before Parliament on 4 February 2013. It will amend the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) to abolish residence and contact orders and will introduce child arrangement orders (CAOs). CAOs will regulate when and with whom a child is to live, spend time with or otherwise have contact. Parental responsibility, specific issue and prohibited steps orders will be unaffected.
Schedule 2 to the CFB 2013 sets out the amendments to be made to the CA 1989. The term "live with" will replace residence orders. The term "spend time or otherwise have contact with" will replace contact orders. This allows the distinction between contact and residence to continue to be made where necessary to make sense of ancillary legislative provisions.
Contact activity conditions and directions will remain, but the reference to 'contact' will be omitted. Activity directions and conditions will apply to all CAOs. Enforcement provisions in the CA 1989 will apply to any provision of CAOs.
The CFB 2013 is expected to receive royal assent during early 2014, with a view to implementation by September 2014.

Domestic violence

Domestic violence disclosure scheme and protection orders to be implemented

The Home Office has announced that the domestic violence disclosure scheme and domestic violence protection orders will be implemented nationally in March 2014. The two pilot schemes are aimed at providing better protection against domestic violence and have been successfully piloted since September 2012 in four police areas (Wiltshire, Nottinghamshire, Gwent and Greater Manchester).

Domestic violence disclosure scheme (Clare's law)

The scheme is named after Clare Wood, who was murdered by her ex-boyfriend, having been unaware of his previous history of violence against women.
It enables:
  • Police to proactively disclose information in prescribed circumstances.
  • A person to ask the police about a partner's previous history of domestic violence. Requests will be checked by a panel of police, probation services and other agencies to ensure information is only passed on where this is lawful, proportionate and necessary.
Home Secretary, Theresa May, said that the scheme will help to ensure that more people can make informed decisions about their relationships.

Domestic violence protection orders

Under this scheme, the police may issue a domestic violence protection notice on the spot (provided they have the authorisation of an officer at superintendent rank) if they have reasonable grounds for believing that a perpetrator has used or threatened violence towards a victim and the victim is at risk of future violent behaviour.
The Family Proceedings Court (and thereafter the single family court) must hear the case for the protection order within 48 hours of the notice being made. If granted, the protection order may last between a minimum of 14 days and a maximum of 28 days.
If you don't yet subscribe to Practical Law, you can request a free trial by completing this form or contacting the Practical Law Helpline.
Published on 02-Jan-2014View Resource History
Resource Type Articles
Jurisdictions
  • England
  • Wales
Related Content