https://s1-uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/WLN-PLCUK-SC_2603.1.2004/productViews/plcuk/Legal updateshttps://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.comDispute Resolutionhttps://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I349f19e92ddd11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I349f19e92ddd11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Cabo Concepts Ltd and another v MGA Entertainment (UK) Ltd and another [2026] EWHC 768 (Ch), the High Court refused to set aside or vary an indemnity costs order imposed after the defendants' failure to disclose around 800,000 documents resulted in the adjournment of a trial. While relief was not warranted here, the relevant provision in such cases was CPR 40.8A (the right of a party against whom a judgment has been given or an order made, to apply for a stay of execution or other relief) and not CPR 3.1(7) (the courts' general power to vary or set aside orders) on which the defendants had relied.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I349f19e92ddd11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ia16e40062dab11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ia16e40062dab11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Eskander v General Medical Council [2026] EWCA Civ 372, the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the strike out of a statutory appeal under section 40 of the Medical Act 1983 filed on the last day for appealing without payment of the court fee.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ia16e40062dab11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I102af5a02dac11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I102af5a02dac11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 CDTOn 31 March 2026, the Judiciary published an announcement outlining court operating hours and arrangements over the Easter period.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I102af5a02dac11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I610de4f8248711f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I610de4f8248711f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Visa Inc and others v Luxottica Retail UK Ltd [2026] EWHC 615 (Comm), construing a settlement agreement which settled claims for £200,000, the court held that it extended to future claims of future associated companies of the defendant, including a claim for more than £10 million by a company in which the defendant's parent company had acquired a controlling interest some months after the settlement agreement was executed. The judgment provides a salutary reminder of the need for caution when drafting clauses setting out the intended scope of any releases in a settlement agreement. It is also of interest for its consideration of the doctrine of sharp practice.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I610de4f8248711f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iec8cce032cfb11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iec8cce032cfb11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn BCP v A Mother [2026] EWFC 71 (B), the court refused to erase information from court documents about a third party who was not a party to the proceedings but had made multiple applications. The court decided it should provide the subject children with a complete record of the care proceedings. The court also named the third party in the published judgment after they had used artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help prepare their skeleton argument, which produced false citations and propositions.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iec8cce032cfb11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I16ed87222ad911f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I16ed87222ad911f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTThe Taking Control of Goods (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2026 (SI 2026/366) were laid before Parliament on 26 March 2026 and will come into force on 1 May 2026.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I16ed87222ad911f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iec8c7f372cfb11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iec8c7f372cfb11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTPractical Law provides free training on how to use Practical Law more effectively. This is available in a variety of formats, including live webinars and training videos.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iec8c7f372cfb11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I8d10284e2c9911f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I8d10284e2c9911f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTPLC Magazine articles are available online. The April 2026 edition includes four articles that may be of interest to Dispute Resolution subscribers.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I8d10284e2c9911f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibf7772312c3511f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibf7772312c3511f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Davies v Lettington and another [2026] EWCA Civ 364, the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the refusal to adjourn a committal hearing to allow the defendant to obtain publicly funded legal representation.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibf7772312c3511f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I0a4ffc3c246011f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I0a4ffc3c246011f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTWe have published a new practice note on limiting liability by a notice.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I0a4ffc3c246011f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If214ef0723c211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If214ef0723c211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTWe have published episode 55 of The Construction Briefing podcast, featuring the Practical Law Construction editorial team.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If214ef0723c211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibf77475b2c3511f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibf77475b2c3511f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTWe have published an article highlighting what's on the agenda for in-house lawyers in April 2026.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibf77475b2c3511f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib49f7fbe292e11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib49f7fbe292e11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn LMND Group Ltd v John Henry Group Ltd (unreported), 15 December 2025, (TCC), HHJ Stephen Davies, sitting as a High Court judge in the Manchester Technology and Construction Court (TCC), refused to enforce the adjudicator's decision, finding that he had materially breached the rules of natural justice.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib49f7fbe292e11f1839deddf1c806e4b/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic694c612292611f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic694c612292611f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTWe have published a new article to the Dispute Resolution column.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic694c612292611f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I88099ce9282f11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I88099ce9282f11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTOn 25 March 2026, the Judiciary published the Commercial Court Annual Report 2024 to 2025, including the Admiralty Court Report.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I88099ce9282f11f1a34ac71bb9879c27/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibd8bf33c245911f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibd8bf33c245911f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn BHP Group (UK) Ltd v Municipio de Mariana [2026] EWCA Civ 294, the Court of Appeal held, unanimously, that procuring a foreign anti-suit injunction restraining English proceedings cannot amount to criminal contempt of court, save in exceptional circumstances.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibd8bf33c245911f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5954320c22f411f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5954320c22f411f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Laing O'Rourke Delivery Ltd v Shepperton Studios Ltd [2026] EWHC 612 (TCC), Simon Lofthouse KC, sitting as a deputy High Court judge in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC), held that a defective payment notice did not contaminate and invalidate the employer's pay less notice. Therefore, the pay less notice reduced the amount due to the contractor (the notified sum). Consequently, the reduced amount of the adjudicator's decision was enforced, with the judge rejecting all of the employer's arguments for a stay of execution.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5954320c22f411f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic1a4dce9232a11f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic1a4dce9232a11f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Manek v Sintl Ventures Ltd [2026] EWHC 600 (Ch), the court provided guidance on the filing of a defence when summary judgment is sought on only part of a claim.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic1a4dce9232a11f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9cbf784b21ef11f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9cbf784b21ef11f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn McGowan v Potter [2026] EWHC 595 (Ch), the court determined the relationship between section 23(c) of the County Courts Act 1984 (which gives jurisdiction to enforce any charge where the amount owing does not exceed the County Court limit (currently £350,000)) and sections 90(3) and 91(8) of the Law of Property Act 1925 (which gives the County Court jurisdiction to exercise the powers under those sections where the amount charged does not exceed £30,000).https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9cbf784b21ef11f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icec850bc21e711f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icec850bc21e711f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn UAB Business Enterprise v Oneta Ltd [2026] EWHC 543 (Ch), the court made some noteworthy findings regarding the evidence of several witnesses, in a trial to determine the ownership of a company called Oneta Ltd. These included rejecting the second claimant's evidence entirely, largely because he was found to be receiving coaching during cross-examination, through his smart glasses, and rejecting the joint expert's opinion.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icec850bc21e711f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9cbf7a2321ef11f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9cbf7a2321ef11f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTOn 16 March 2026, the 12th edition of the King's Bench Guide was published by the judiciary.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9cbf7a2321ef11f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf1505e212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf1505e212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Tax Policy Associates Ltd v Kamal [2026] EWHC 551 (KB), the High Court struck out parts of a libel and malicious falsehood claim and granted summary judgment to the defendants, also declaring the claim to be a statutory strategic litigation against public participation (SLAPP) under section 195 of the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf1505e212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3cd3c5c61e8911f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3cd3c5c61e8911f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon and others v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2026] EWHC 556 (KB), the court refused the claimants' (C) application, at trial, to rely on additional hearsay evidence from Mr Gavin Burrows (GB) (whose evidence was a major component of C's case), but granted conditional permission for C to call GB as their witness and conduct examination-in-chief.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3cd3c5c61e8911f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I30974a671ee511f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I30974a671ee511f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTOn 13 March 2026, the Chancellor of the High Court issued a Rolls Building Practice Note regarding the submission of costs information for summary assessments from 14 April 2026.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I30974a671ee511f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf10487212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf10487212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTWe have published a new practice note on service of documents in foreign proceedings in England and Wales.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf10487212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9b35ecc51d4711f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9b35ecc51d4711f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Global Fintech Investments Holding AG v Linklaters LLP [2025] EWHC 2969 (Comm), the High Court refused an application under CPR 7.7(3) to dismiss the claim for non-compliance with a CPR 7.7(1) notice requiring service of the claim form or discontinuance. In so doing, the court provided guidance on the interpretation and scope of CPR 7.7.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I9b35ecc51d4711f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf10879212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf10879212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTAs part of our civil fraud series, we have published a new practice note on cryptocurrency fraud, written by Alyssa Stansbury, Barrister, One Essex Court. The note gives an overview of the key legal issues arising in civil fraud claims involving cryptocurrencies under English law.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iacf10879212811f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ied441ac91dc511f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ied441ac91dc511f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTThe approved minutes of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee meeting held on 6 February 2026 became publicly available on 12 March 2026.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ied441ac91dc511f182b7cb1210d47fc6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib5b3ccc31e1211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib5b3ccc31e1211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTOn 12 March 2026, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee (CPRC) published its Annual Report 2024-25.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib5b3ccc31e1211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2e73aeae1e2211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2e73aeae1e2211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 CDTIn Hassan-Soudey (aka Hamilton) and others v Siniakovich [2026] EWCA Civ 215, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that an action is brought for limitation purposes when the claim form is first delivered to the court office, even if the appropriate fee has not been paid in full and the court office legitimately refuses to issue it, or, if filed electronically, it fails the acceptance process for the same reason.https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2e73aeae1e2211f19e89beb9184c64d5/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29