<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet title = "XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/RSS/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><docs>https://s1-uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/WLN-PLCUK-SC_2605.1.2002/productViews/plcuk/</docs><category>Legal updates</category><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com</link><title>Family</title><description>Family</description><item><title>Court has jurisdiction to make global maintenance order following CMS assessment (High Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If54abad5601c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If54abad5601c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In P v M (Appeal: unfair hearing: variation of periodical payments: global orders) [2026] EWHC 1330 (Fam), Harrison J allowed the wife's appeal of an order that varied her spousal maintenance downwards. He concluded that there was jurisdiction for the court to vary the spousal maintenance upwards and make a global maintenance order to circumvent lower child maintenance that the wife was receiving under a Child Maintenance Service assessment obtained by the husband.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If54abad5601c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Government consultation on financial remedy law reform, qualifying nuptial agreements, and separation rights and inheritance law reform for cohabitants</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If7c37552635411f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If7c37552635411f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 5 June 2026, the Ministry of Justice published a consultation, A fairer end to relationships: A consultation on reforming financial remedies on divorce and strengthening protections for cohabitants at the end of their relationship. The consultation seeks views on reforming the financial remedies framework for divorcing couples, introducing binding qualifying nuptial agreements, creating a statutory framework for cohabitants on separation and extending intestacy rights to cohabitants. The consultation closes on 14 August 2026.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If7c37552635411f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>HMCTS updates Form C8 to expand details that can be kept confidential and agencies that can access them (June 2026)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib48476af63e711f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib48476af63e711f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 4 June 2026, HMCTS published a revised Form C8, Confidential contact details</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib48476af63e711f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Updated guidance on remote hearings in family proceedings</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2ee7f501604411f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2ee7f501604411f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The President of the Family Division has approved updated guidance for remote hearings in family proceedings. This follows a wider review of remote participation across the civil, family and tribunal jurisdictions and the publication of cross-jurisdictional guidance.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2ee7f501604411f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>New guidance and principles for remote hearings published by judiciary (June 2026)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I534ac2a2618811f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I534ac2a2618811f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 4 June 2026, the Judiciary published updated guidance on remote participation in hearings. The guidance comprises new Remote Participation Judicial Principles and Overarching Guidance for Remote Participation, alongside updated jurisdictional guidance for all court and tribunal jurisdictions.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I534ac2a2618811f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>HMCTS updates court forms to include more information about using Form C8</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibefd32bc5f2411f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibefd32bc5f2411f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 1 June 2026, HMCTS published revised versions of a range of court forms to include more information about using Form C8 to apply to keep contact details confidential.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibefd32bc5f2411f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>House of Lords Library publishes briefing paper on CMS reforms</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I640c9fd45f6111f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I640c9fd45f6111f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The House of Lords Library has published a briefing paper in advance of the House of Lords debate about the Public Services Committee report on reforming the Child Maintenance Service. The briefing paper includes a summary of the government's response to the report.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I640c9fd45f6111f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Deprivation of liberty acid test in Cheshire West overruled in favour of Strasbourg multifactorial approach (Supreme Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If3ae250d5e6c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If3ae250d5e6c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court has unanimously overruled Cheshire West [2014] UKSC 19 and its "acid test" for determining whether there is a deprivation of liberty under Article 5 ECHR, holding that this departed from the Strasbourg's longstanding multifactorial approach, which will now need to be applied. The court held that an individual lacking legal capacity under mental capacity legislation may nonetheless give valid consent to confinement through expression of wishes and feelings. The decision has UK-wide significance and is likely to completely change the landscape in relation to deprivations of liberty.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/If3ae250d5e6c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>DfE launches consultation on information sharing duty statutory guidance</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I08fb9c865ffc11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I08fb9c865ffc11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The Department for Education (DfE) launched a consultation on draft statutory guidance on the information sharing duty introduced by the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I08fb9c865ffc11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>LAA cyber security incident page updated: streamlined content and new training resources for providers</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I973601715f4f11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I973601715f4f11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 29 May 2026, the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) updated its cyber security incident page to streamline the information outlining standard processes following the restoration of online systems, and to include links to additional training materials on the Legal Aid Learning website to support providers.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I973601715f4f11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Family Justice Council to hold 12th open meeting</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ieb22726a5f6e11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ieb22726a5f6e11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The Family Justice Council will hold its 12th open meeting virtually on 13 July 2026 from 11.00 am to 1.30 pm. Applications to attend must be submitted by 8 July 2026.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ieb22726a5f6e11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Eleven-point framework for anonymisation of judgment decisions (High Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I155f018a5d9611f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I155f018a5d9611f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Blackpool BC v RR [2026] EWHC 1100 (Fam) MacDonald J distilled the principles governing the anonymisation of judgments into an eleven-point framework and concluded that the exercise of the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court is the correct cause of action for a pre-publication anonymisation application.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I155f018a5d9611f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Controlling and coercive behaviour requires nexus between alleged perpetrator's actions and victim's feelings (Family Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iac04aa365aab11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iac04aa365aab11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In F v M [2026] EWFC 116 (B), in proceedings under section 8 of the Children Act 1989, HHJ Owens clarified that making a finding of controlling and coercive behaviour requires a nexus between the alleged perpetrator's actions and the victim feeling controlled or coerced. Without such a link, the court cannot properly assess risk where findings are made.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iac04aa365aab11f1a83fe84dcd0bf6af/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Free Practical Law training for all subscribers</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I56cd5e505a7c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I56cd5e505a7c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>Practical Law provides free training on how to use Practical Law more effectively. This is available in a variety of formats, including live webinars and training videos.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I56cd5e505a7c11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Interim charging order made final despite pending child maintenance proceedings (High Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib622c93f59e511f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib622c93f59e511f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In AJ v FJ [2026] EWFC 113, MacDonald J made an interim charging order final to enforce an unpaid costs order. The court determined that judgment creditors can expect to enforce an unappealed costs judgment, subject to arguments on financial hardship. Where a debtor may be owed arrears of child maintenance by a creditor, which could be offset against the debt, pending child maintenance proceedings will not prevent the court from making an interim charging order final.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib622c93f59e511f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Standard order 10.2 (short form non-molestation) updated to include respondent's details</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I1831151255d511f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I1831151255d511f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 21 May 2026, standard order 10:2 (short form non-molestation order) was updated to include additional fields for the respondent's details, which are necessary for police database purposes.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I1831151255d511f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>HMCTS launches new online tools to help separating parents make child arrangements</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I53a7ab295a7b11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I53a7ab295a7b11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>HMCTS has launched new tools to help separating parents find options for, and make, child arrangements.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I53a7ab295a7b11f18ebba5f5b5f97226/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Financial remedy appeal struck out due to absence of personal representative for deceased appellant's estate (Court of Appeal)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib1cf3733538411f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib1cf3733538411f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Kanabar v Kanabar (Deceased) [2026] EWCA Civ 582, the husband obtained permission to appeal a financial remedy order made in proceedings against his first wife. He died intestate before the appeal hearing and his second wife was unwilling to apply for letters of administration. Given the absence of an effective appellant, Baker LJ confirmed that the correct approach was to strike out the appeal (Family Procedure Rule 30.10).</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib1cf3733538411f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Law Society publishes response to CJC's consultation on use of AI for preparing court documents (May 2026)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic3217cfc4f7e11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic3217cfc4f7e11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 12 May 2026, the Law Society published a response to the Civil Justice Council's (CJC's) consultation on the use of AI for preparing court documents.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic3217cfc4f7e11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026: public law children aspects</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I87c380c54fa911f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I87c380c54fa911f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 has been published. The public law children aspects have yet to come into force. Among other provisions, the statute covers matters such as the pre-proceedings offer of family group decision-making meetings, the amendment of section 25 of the Children Act 1989 to include the deprivation of liberty of children, and a definition of kinship care.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I87c380c54fa911f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Family Procedure Rule Committee: publication of approved minutes of meeting on 13 April 2026</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibde5dc894f0a11f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibde5dc894f0a11f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The approved minutes of the Family Procedure Rule Committee meeting on 13 April 2026 have been published.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ibde5dc894f0a11f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Peel J updates standard family orders (May 2026)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I27f3cbe54d1311f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I27f3cbe54d1311f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>Peel J has issued updated standard family orders to reflect developments in law and practice.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I27f3cbe54d1311f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Procedural stay of foreign relocation order does not act prospectively to render child's prior relocation unlawful (High Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5acd8228495511f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5acd8228495511f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In TD v MT [2026] EWHC 952 (Fam), the High Court dismissed the father's application under the 1980 Hague Convention having determined that a procedural stay of a foreign relocation order arising from the father's appeal, did not render the child's prior lawful relocation from South Africa to England under the order, unlawful.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5acd8228495511f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Transparency and Open Justice Board publishes update on current work and priorities (April 2026) </title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id15a6b00492411f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id15a6b00492411f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 30 April 2026, the Transparency and Open Justice Board published an update on its current work objectives and priorities for 2026-2027.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id15a6b00492411f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Mr R (CAS-104796-R9Q9): pension sharing on divorce: liability for lifetime allowance charge does not transfer on implementation of pension compensation sharing order</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6714db22485711f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6714db22485711f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The Pension Protection Fund Ombudsman has given his determination in a complaint by Mr R against the Board of the Pension Protection Fund.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6714db22485711f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Publicity permitted in non-Hague abduction proceedings to secure father's return to custody (High Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iee0fe748487c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iee0fe748487c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In N'Djosse v Adeyeye [2026] EWHC 1033 (Fam), Hayden J permitted the publication of information concerning the child and his parents in proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court. The child's father had been serving a term of imprisonment for breach of a return order but was released from prison in error. Publication was necessary to locate the father and secure his return to custody as a means of reuniting the child with his mother.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iee0fe748487c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Court lacks jurisdiction to order children's guardian to facilitate contact (Family Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic0e0d1c4489911f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic0e0d1c4489911f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In E v D [2025] EWFC 512 (B), the Family Court allowed an appeal by the children's guardian (CG) against an order made in private law welfare proceedings requiring CG to facilitate and support interim contact between the children and their father. The court lacked jurisdiction to order a CG to facilitate contact and should not have attached a penal notice to the order. Compelling a CG to facilitate contact is contrary to the role of a CG to conduct proceedings on the child's behalf and for their benefit.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic0e0d1c4489911f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Pure public policy considerations are not relevant when court considers authorising surrogacy payments (High Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I011ae726456c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I011ae726456c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In A and B v C and D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam), Williams J held that "pure" public policy considerations have no legitimate role in the court's decision about whether to authorise payments exceeding reasonable expenses under section 54(8) of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA 2008) when determining parental order applications. Since the authorisation decision is governed by the paramount welfare assessment, pure public policy issues cannot be weighed against the child's welfare. The three traditional questions in Re X and Y (Foreign Surrogacy) [2008] EWHC 3030 (Fam) remain relevant only insofar as they inform the welfare evaluation.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I011ae726456c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>LAA updates SaBC guidance to include amended family fee codes and information on voided claims</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I011b353e456c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I011b353e456c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>On 29 April 2026, the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) updated its SaBC guidance to include information on identifying and requesting support for claims that have been voided, and to revise the family fee codes.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I011b353e456c11f18619811f89168d29/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>English domicile of choice retained where wife considered move to Italy temporary (Court of Appeal)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6336bc30455611f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6336bc30455611f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Ferrara v Ferrara [2026] EWCA Civ 512, the Court of Appeal dismissed the husband's appeal against a decision that the wife had retained her English domicile of choice despite residing in Italy since 2019, and against the refusal to stay the English divorce proceedings. Regarding which jurisdiction was the more appropriate forum, Arnold LJ expressed a different view on the relevance of historical connections to the jurisdictions.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6336bc30455611f1bf8d82e776af4c9e/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item></channel></rss>