<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet title = "XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/RSS/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><docs>https://s1-uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/WLN-PLCUK-SC_2609.2.2010/productViews/plcuk/</docs><category>Legal updates</category><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com</link><title>Arbitration</title><description>Arbitration</description><item><title>Defective Premises Act claim after arbitration was not abuse of process (TCC)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3502c08ac2f311f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3502c08ac2f311f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd v Taylor Woodrow Construction and another [2026] EWHC 2526 (TCC), Pepperall J, in the Technology and Construction Court (TCC), refused to strike out a claim under the Defective Premises Act 1972 as an abuse of process. The claimant was not the privy of an associated company whose claim for the same damage had been dismissed as statute-barred in an earlier arbitration. The court also rejected the argument that the claim was an impermissible collateral attack on the arbitral awards.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3502c08ac2f311f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Singapore High Court sets aside ad hoc award against non-participating respondent based on forged charterparty</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3c68e8a3c5b011f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3c68e8a3c5b011f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In DZD v DZE [2026] SGHC 199, the Singapore High Court set aside an ad hoc arbitration award against a non-participating respondent, finding no charterparty or arbitration agreement. The court rejected arguments based on section 2A(6) of the Singapore International Arbitration Act 1994, the respondent's payment of freight and the alleged formation of a charterparty by conduct.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3c68e8a3c5b011f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Updated in-house content on solicitor apprenticeships</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5ec44eacc61211f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5ec44eacc61211f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>We have updated our practice note on solicitor apprenticeships.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5ec44eacc61211f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Paris Court of First Instance dismisses National Oil Corporation's challenge to seizure in enforcement of Al-Kharafi award against Libya</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iebeb7684c2fc11f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iebeb7684c2fc11f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In National Oil Corporation v Al-Kharafi &amp; Sons (RG No 25/82100), the Paris Court of First Instance upheld a seizure of assets held by Libya's National Oil Corporation (NOC), carried out to enforce a 2013 ICC arbitration award against Libya. The court held that NOC qualified as an emanation of the Libyan state, lacking both functional and patrimonial independence, meaning its assets could be seized to satisfy a judgment against Libya.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Iebeb7684c2fc11f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Autumn 2026 Budget: Practical Law coverage</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I76ca6195b0f011f1a4a6ef66852f62f9/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I76ca6195b0f011f1a4a6ef66852f62f9/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>The Chancellor will deliver the Autumn 2026 Budget on 28 October 2026. This update explains how Practical Law plans to cover the event.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I76ca6195b0f011f1a4a6ef66852f62f9/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Arbitrary tax administration breached FET despite rejection of stability-scope and umbrella-clause claims (ICSID)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I408dbb33c19611f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I408dbb33c19611f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In SMM Cerro Verde Netherlands BV v Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No. ARB/20/14), an ICSID tribunal found that Peru breached the fair and equitable treatment standard under the Netherlands-Peru bilateral investment treaty due to non-transparent, procedurally improper and arbitrary conduct in administering tax assessments. The award illustrates how an investment tribunal can scrutinise how a state administers tax assessments, penalties, interest and stability commitments without necessarily overturning the underlying tax interpretation.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I408dbb33c19611f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>German Federal Court of Justice: third-party notice against arbitrator permitted in set-aside proceedings</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I162f5074c0a911f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I162f5074c0a911f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Docket No I ZB 6/26, the German Federal Court of Justice confirmed that third-party notice (Streitverkündung) against an arbitrator is permitted in set-aside proceedings if a party believes it may have a damages claim against that arbitrator.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I162f5074c0a911f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Introduction of the Business and Property Division (BPD) and changes to rules on arbitration claims</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6d1b2590bbd811f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6d1b2590bbd811f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>A significant restructuring of the High Court of England and Wales took effect on 1 October 2026, with the introduction of the Business and Property Division (BPD) of the High Court. A suite of amendments has been made to reflect the creation of the BPD. Alongside these reforms, changes to CPR 62 and Practice Direction 62 clarify court rules on certain procedural aspects of arbitration claims.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I6d1b2590bbd811f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Singapore Court of Appeal confirms transnational issue estoppel can defeat state's claim to immunity in arbitral award enforcement</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I69e3b35dbd8b11f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I69e3b35dbd8b11f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In The Russian Federation v Veteran Petroleum Ltd and others [2026] SGCA(I) 5, the Singapore Court of Appeal (COA) dismissed the Russian Federation's appeal, holding that the doctrine of transnational issue estoppel precluded Russia's reliance on state immunity to resist enforcement of three arbitral awards. The COA held that Russia was bound by the Dutch courts' prior, final determination as courts of the arbitral seat that Russia had agreed in writing to submit its dispute with the claimants to arbitration, and so was not entitled to state immunity under the State Immunity Act 1979.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I69e3b35dbd8b11f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Investment managers of Cayman Islands funds holding TV Azteca notes are not "investors" with jurisdiction under NAFTA and the USMCA (ICSID)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I35be2d5bbc1b11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I35be2d5bbc1b11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Cyrus Capital Partners LP and Contrarian Capital Management LLC v United Mexican States (ICSID Case No ARB/23/33), an ICSID tribunal declined jurisdiction over claims arising from a Mexican court injunction affecting TV Azteca notes (debt securities). The tribunal held that the claimants, as investment managers, were not "investors" who owned or controlled an investment under articles 1116 and 1139 of NAFTA, and did not hold a "legacy investment" under annex 14-C of the USMCA.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I35be2d5bbc1b11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Free Practical Law training for all subscribers</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3ac2fe42bc1811f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3ac2fe42bc1811f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>Practical Law provides free training on how to use Practical Law more effectively. This is available in a variety of formats, including live webinars and training videos.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I3ac2fe42bc1811f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Hong Kong launches stakeholder consultation on arbitration law reform</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ided9911ebc0611f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ided9911ebc0611f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>A stakeholder consultation on proposed amendments to the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance was launched following a review of the legislation by an expert working group. Proposals include a default rule on the governing law of the arbitration agreement, judicial review of negative jurisdictional rulings, and a framework for arbitration of trust disputes.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ided9911ebc0611f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>New in-house content on pro bono programmes</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I19279eb0bb2011f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I19279eb0bb2011f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>We have published an article that provides some practical steps to help get in-house teams started on establishing a pro bono programme.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I19279eb0bb2011f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>New in-house content: horizon scanning</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id8b72cf4bb1b11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id8b72cf4bb1b11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>We have published an article highlighting what's on the agenda for in-house lawyers in October 2026.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id8b72cf4bb1b11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Singapore International Commercial Court dismisses set-aside application by non-participating respondent in SIAC arbitration</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I115b0453b8ba11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I115b0453b8ba11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In DWJ v DWK [2026] SGHC(I) 18, the Singapore International Commercial Court dismissed an application to set aside a SIAC arbitration award where the respondent had declined to participate in the arbitration. The court rejected challenges based on breach of natural justice, fraud and public policy, holding that voluntary abstention from arbitration cannot ground a set-aside application.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I115b0453b8ba11f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Swiss judgment rejecting award challenge does not create estoppel precluding state immunity claim in English court enforcement proceedings (Commercial Court) </title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I84e38794b72911f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I84e38794b72911f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Yukos Capital Ltd v The Russian Federation [2026] EWHC 1918 (Comm), the English Commercial Court held that a Swiss judgment dismissing an application to set aside an arbitral award did not give rise to cause of action estoppel or issue estoppel. Russia was therefore not precluded from asserting state immunity in English award enforcement proceedings.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I84e38794b72911f19cb7bba67601920a/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>No power, no enforcement: CIETAC emergency arbitrator's interim award set aside for want of authority under Chinese law (Singapore High Court)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I8ae0493eb64411f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I8ae0493eb64411f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co Ltd v Moveon Technologies Pte Ltd [2026] SGHC 186, the Singapore High Court set aside an enforcement order in respect of an interim award issued by a CIETAC emergency arbitrator, holding that the emergency arbitrator lacked the power to grant interim measures under the applicable law (Chinese law) or the parties' agreement. The decision provides important guidance on the limits of emergency arbitrator powers in China-seated CIETAC arbitrations and the primacy of the lex arbitri in determining those powers.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I8ae0493eb64411f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Hong Kong court grants anti-suit injunction to restrain mainland PRC litigation and safeguard award enforcement (Hong Kong Court of First Instance)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icf8e87e9b5a911f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icf8e87e9b5a911f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In 廈門新景地集團有限公司 v Eton Properties Ltd and Eton Properties (Holdings) Ltd [2026] HKCFI 5258, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance held that the pursuit of Xiamen court proceedings by Hong Kong award debtors constituted a vexatious and oppressive attempt to frustrate enforcement of a CIETAC award in Hong Kong and relitigate matters already decided by the Hong Kong courts.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icf8e87e9b5a911f1a49dc6e79963ff6f/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>German Federal Court of Justice confirms enforceability of award against Libya, rejecting sovereign immunity objection</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ifd60455bb34e11f1a85a97c6d86a7022/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ifd60455bb34e11f1a85a97c6d86a7022/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Docket No I ZB 107/25, the German Federal Court of Justice confirmed the enforceability of a foreign award against Libya, rejecting the sovereign immunity objection raised by Libya.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ifd60455bb34e11f1a85a97c6d86a7022/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Irish High Court grants letters rogatory to compel witness testimony from non-party resident in Ireland for US arbitration</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icc545ea0b11b11f1a85a97c6d86a7022/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icc545ea0b11b11f1a85a97c6d86a7022/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In TikTok Inc v Rosendin Electric Inc [2026] IEHC 555, the Irish High Court exercised its jurisdiction under article 27 of the UNCITRAL Model Law and section 15 of the Irish Arbitration Act 2010 to give effect to a request for international judicial assistance issued by a US-based arbitrator. The court directed a witness, a US citizen residing in Dublin, to attend for examination on oath in aid of a commercial arbitration pending in California. This is the first reported Irish decision in which the court has ordered the taking of evidence from a non-party witness to assist a foreign arbitral tribunal.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Icc545ea0b11b11f1a85a97c6d86a7022/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Singapore High Court dismisses challenge to arbitral award based on tribunal's reliance on unpleaded contractual provisions</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id086ce77b01211f1a4a6ef66852f62f9/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id086ce77b01211f1a4a6ef66852f62f9/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In DWL v DWM [2026] SGHC 179, the Singapore High Court dismissed an application to set aside a Singapore-seated arbitral award under section 24 of the Singapore International Arbitration Act 1994. In doing so, the court considered whether a tribunal's reliance on contractual provisions not expressly raised by the parties could support a successful challenge on the grounds of excess of jurisdiction or breach of the fair hearing rule.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id086ce77b01211f1a4a6ef66852f62f9/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Setting aside arbitral awards: Hague Court of Appeal rejects impartiality challenge to arbitrator and upholds tribunal's discretion on statutory interest start date</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id59ef606ad4c11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id59ef606ad4c11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In MetaCorp International Inc v [Defendant] (ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2026:2532), the Court of Appeal of The Hague dismissed MetaCorp's application to set aside, or partially set aside, a Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI) award, rejecting both a challenge to the impartiality of the defendant's appointed arbitrator and an attack on the statutory interest start date fixed by the tribunal. The underlying arbitration concerned the buyback of shares that a former chief executive officer of MetaCorp was required to transfer to the company on the termination of their employment in 2020.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Id59ef606ad4c11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>ICSID tribunal finds NAFTA article 1105 breaches in quarrying dispute, but majority substantially limits damages</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib6866c7bad0111f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib6866c7bad0111f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Legacy Vulcan, LLC v United Mexican States (ICSID Case No ARB/19/1), an ICSID tribunal found that Mexico had breached NAFTA article 1105 regarding two quarrying lots, but the majority awarded damages for only one of the properties.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ib6866c7bad0111f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>New case study on commencing ICC arbitration under 2026 Rules</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5457523bacb911f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5457523bacb911f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>We have published a new Case study, Commencing ICC arbitration (2026 Rules), which illustrates the commencement of an International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration under the ICC Rules of Arbitration 2026.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I5457523bacb911f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>No apparent bias where presiding arbitrator had ruled against witness in previous arbitration (Hong Kong Court of First Instance)</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I54575070acb911f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I54575070acb911f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In O v S [2026] HKCFI 4910, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance refused an award debtor's application to set aside an HKIAC partial award that it alleged was tainted by apparent bias because the presiding arbitrator had, in an earlier (apparently unconnected) arbitration, ruled against a witness who gave evidence for the award debtor in the later arbitration.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I54575070acb911f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>SICC rejects apparent bias challenge arising from arbitrator non-disclosures and third-party funding links</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I01cf0f2da86711f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I01cf0f2da86711f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In The Tata Power Company Ltd v Kleros Capital Partners Ltd [2026] SGHC(I) 15, the Singapore International Commercial Court dismissed an apparent-bias challenge against arbitrators in a SIAC arbitration, ruling that the challenging party had not sufficiently proved that the alleged bias from alleged non-disclosures and third-party funding links indicated a danger that a fair determination of the dispute was not possible.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I01cf0f2da86711f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>The Hague Court of Appeal declines to set aside UNCITRAL award in favour of Tanzania's roads agency  </title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I58ba60e4a7be11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I58ba60e4a7be11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2026:2472, The Hague Court of Appeal declined to set aside an UNCITRAL award in favour of Tanzania's roads agency due to the claimants' failure to comply with applicable requirements and time limits under the Dutch Arbitration Act. The court found that the fact that the claimants' lawyers in the arbitration were unfamiliar with Dutch arbitration law was at their own risk.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I58ba60e4a7be11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>Updated resources for trainees and new joiners (autumn 2026) </title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic8581132a6b911f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic8581132a6b911f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>We have updated our resources for trainees, new joiners and those putting together training materials for them.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ic8581132a6b911f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>New article on France's new arbitration decree of 6 August 2026 and its key takeaways for international arbitration</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I58ba3dc3a7be11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I58ba3dc3a7be11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>We have published a new Article, France's new arbitration decree of 6 August 2026: Key takeaways for international arbitration, which considers Decree No 2026-741 of 6 August 2026, introducing the first proposals for reform of French arbitration law in fifteen years.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I58ba3dc3a7be11f1858dc303bc627988/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item><item><title>A light touch: Supreme Court of Victoria affirms arbitral tribunal's authority to determine own jurisdiction</title><link>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ide4351daa79311f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ide4351daa79311f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate><description>In Zoo Property Wealth Builder Pty Ltd v Australia Red Hill Real Estate Group Pty Ltd [2026] VSC 509, the Supreme Court of Victoria refused to hear substantive arguments as to the validity of the underlying contract and arbitration agreement in the context of an application to appoint an arbitrator. In doing so, the court confirmed that complex jurisdictional challenges, including forgery and non est factum, are for the tribunal, not the court, to resolve.</description><guid>https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/Ide4351daa79311f18fc1891fbf1e1888/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&amp;contextData=%28sc.Default%29</guid></item></channel></rss>