Practical Law Dispute Resolution blog to 3 May 2017: Part 36, fixed costs and artificial intelligence

Practical Law UK Legal Update w-007-8497 (Approx. 4 pages)

Practical Law Dispute Resolution blog to 3 May 2017: Part 36, fixed costs and artificial intelligence

by Practical Law Dispute Resolution

Three new posts have been published on the Practical Law Dispute Resolution blog. Kerry Underwood at Underwoods Solicitors considers the relationship between Part 36 and fixed costs. Philip Woodfield and Kimberly Hedtke at CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP analyse the tactical advantages of Part 36. Amber Jenner at Kennedys discusses artificial intelligence and whether it can be used to prevent insurance fraud.

Three new posts have been published on the Practical Law Dispute Resolution Blog:

In Blog post, Part 36 and fixed costs, Kerry Underwood at Underwoods Solicitors considers the relationship between Part 36 and fixed costs, and proposes a new system of calculating Part 36 penalties and rewards.
In Blog post, Staying on the right side of Part 36: lessons learned, Philip Woodfield and Kimberly Hedtke at CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP analyse Part 36 and how it can be used as a tactical advantage, in the context of the decisions in OMV Petrom SA v Glencore International AG [2017] EWCA Civ 195 and Jockey Club Racecourse Ltd v Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd [2016] EWHC 167 (TCC).
In Blog post, Can artificial intelligence (AI) prevent insurance fraud? Amber Jenner at Kennedys discusses how artificial intelligence could be used in a variety of ways as a means of preventing insurance fraud, which costs the insurance industry an estimated £1.5 billion each year.

End of Document

Also Found In

Resource ID w-007-8497

Published on 03-May-2017

Resource Type Legal update: archive

Jurisdictions

England
Wales